Menu:
Filepath: Wednesday, March 10 2010



Forgot password?

Issues
Air emission/Annex VI
Air emission/GHGs
Bunkers
Chemical
Environment
Clarifying China’s marine pollution regulations effective from 1 March 2010 Seventh annual shipping industry Tripartite meeting in Beijing IMO acts on marine noise pollution and ship strikes on whales Whale and Cetacean Conservation USCG Environmental Awareness Sewage Regulations VECS (Vapour Emission Control Systems) Environmental Projects Environmental Organisations Environmental Bulletins IMO Meeting Papers North American Issues Pollution Prevention Air Emission Antifouling paints Reception Facilities Ballast water
Human Element
Insurance
Legal and Documentary
Anti-trust/Competition Law Case Summaries
Achilleas – House of Lords gives certainty on damages for late redelivery Acina - Shelltime 4 Afrapearl – Court of Appeal reverses first instance decision 'Alaska' - New York Arbitration 'Alsternstern' - The more hazardous the cargo, the more difficult to show seaworthiness Ambor/Once (the) - time charter - last voyage - Shelltime 4, Clause 19 considered Aniara - Charterers may cancel if tendering improper Archimidis – decision of the English High Court and Court of Appeal Asbatankvoy Clause 8 - New York arbitration Cape Horn - guarantee on behalf of charterers’ holding company Count (the) - High Court - safe port warranty Diamond Park and Emerald Park – vetting issues discussed Doric Pride – vessel detained by U.S. authorities Elli and Frixos – decision of the English High Court Front Commander - Court of Appeal decision Golden Victory - House of Lords - assessment of damages Halki - Arbitration Clause - Construction - Application for stay of proceedings Halki - Case law update - Court of Appeal decision 'Happy Day' - Allows owners' appeal and restores the award of the arbitrators 'Happy Day' - Glencore Grain Limited v Flacker Shipping Limited Happy Day - NOR 'Hill Harmony' - Court of Appeal upholds High Court decision on master's right to choose the route Hill Harmony - House of Lords - Master cannot ignore charterer's order on to the route to be taken - Court of Appeal Kriti Akti – Court of Appeal affirms High Court decision – Shelltime 3 – length of charter Li Hai – withdrawal from hire Liepaya - Recent English case law: Failure to give adequate notice of redelivery Loss not in parties’ contemplation Marika M - Whether vessel off-hire during period of repair Masters can decide route – recent decision of the English High Court Motis Exports - Court of Appeal upholder High Court decision - forged Bill of Lading New York arbitration decision – Asbatankvoy – foreseeability Nikmary - English Court of Appeal decision Obo Venture - Claims Clause Panalpine - What if English law had applied ? Paragon – unenforceable penalty for late redelivery Peter Schmidt - Asbtatankvoy - Validity of NOR Peter Schmidt - Demurrage/laytime recent case law English Commercial Court Protank Orinoco - Cargo Retention Clause Ruhr Ore - Recent New York Arbitration decision - lightering/crew rest periods Sabrewing - Demurrage Time Bar Clauses Seaflower - High Court - Rights of cancellation under vetting clause Stolt Spur - Vessel under multiple charters Voltaz - Whether demurrage claim time barred
Charter Party Advice Charter Party forms Charterers Clause EU Ship Source Pollution Directive litigation INTERTANKO Chartering Publications INTERTANKO Model Clauses INTERTANKO’s Freight and Demurrage Information Pool Law of the Sea: the challenge of unilateral measures v. uniform rules London Arbitration New ‘At A Glance’ Guide to pollution legislation Questions & Answers - various charterparties Tanker Chartering Seminars Useful links Washington State litigation
Marine safety
Navigation
Phase out
Piracy
Ports and Terminals
Research and Projects
SECA
Security
Abbreviations related to security Access of public authorities, emergency response and pilots Common approach by Round Table partners Company Security Officers (CSOs) – guidelines on training and certification Compliance on 1 July 2004 Continuous Synopsis Record (CSR) Crew Visas Declaration of Security (DOS) European Union Excessive terminal and crew restrictions Global integrated shipping information (GISIS) database IMO guidance for implementation of the ISPS Code Interface with FPSO/FSUs Interim certification INTERTANKO involved in piracy awareness training initiative in the Philippines INTERTANKO Model Clauses INTERTANKO Security Bulletin INTERTANKO to share security information with U.S. Coast Guard ISPS Code requirements for exercises Joint industry feedback form on maritime security Joint industry submissions to MSC79 Long Range Identification and Tracking (LRIT) Maritime Security into STCW Minimum requirements for the issue of certificates of proficiency for SSOs Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circulars (NVICS) North American Issues Obligation to notify flag states when exercising control and compliance measures Seafarers’ Identity Documents (SIDS) Security cost reflected in the 2006 Worldscale schedule Security included in STCW Convention Ship Security Alert System (SSAS) Ship security officer (SSO) Shore leave and access to ships Special Purpose Ships (SPS) Submission of vessel/facility security plan under MTSA Suppression of Unlawful Acts (SUA) – new protocols adopted The final rule Timely ISPS Code compliance U.S. standardises ID requirements for officials accessing vessels or facilities US ports - security status USCG USCG releases Port Security Advisory on port facility security in Haiti Voluntary self-assessment by SOLAS Contracting Governments and port facilities Voluntary self-assessment checklist for Companies and CSOs
Technical
IACS CSR tracking database goes on line Protective coatings of dedicated seawater ballast tanks required in all types of ships and double-sided skin spaces of bulk carriers Means of Access INTERTANKO Model Clauses Technical Projects IMO Meeting Papers USCG INTERTANKO/OCIMF/Class Discussions North American Issues Bunkering - general Bunker Alerts Air Emissions Tank Level and Pressure Monitoring (TLPM) Systems Tanker Specification Awareness Guide Transparency Protection of Bunker Tanks FPSOs and FSUs - MARPOL Annex I Requirements Goal Based Standards Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) Newbuilding Standards: Extended guarantee/net-scantlings/corrosion margins Generic vs. ship specific corrosion allowances for existing ships Coating on cargo tanks
Vetting & Port State Control
Worldscale
 
Regions
Asia
Europe
North America
 
Benchmarking
TMSA2
Crew & Officer Retention
Lost Time Indicator (LTI)
 
Databases
Human Element Landscape Database
Port Information
Questionnaire 88
STS Database
Terminal Vetting Reports & Terminal Satisfaction Sheets
 
Various
Annual Events
Committees, councils and regional panels
IMO submisssions
Intertanko Presentations
Intranet (Staff Only)
Maritime Industry Knowledge Centre
Poseidon Challenge
Tanker Issues A-Z
Weekly NEWS
 
 
Mail present page to a friend Print present page

More Headlines
Tanker News
INTERTANKO and DNV issue Guidance for VOC Management Plans
Published: 16 February 2010 12:23
Updated: 05 March 2010 13:16

Amendments to MARPOL Annex VI (Air Pollution from Ships) will enter into force on 1 July 2010. Among the new mandatory requirements, crude oil carriers will be required to develop a Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Management Plan which will need to be approved by a Recognised Organisation (RO)/Class. The VOC Management Plan will have to follow the IMO Guidelines.

INTERTANKO and Det Norske Veritas (DNV) have issued a joint Guidance which is aimed at assisting Members to develop VOC Management Plans for their crude oil tankers.

The document has two parts: Part A in which INTERTANKO and DNV provide guidance and clarifications on what should be the content of the VOC Management Plan and Part B which will actually need to be filled in by each member company and then submitted to Class for approval. The Appendix to Part B includes a suggested Voyage NMVOC (non methane VOC) Emissions Calculation standard form.

A copy of the guidance and of an Excel spreadsheet for the Voyage NMVOC Emissions Calculation standard form is available to INTERTANKO Members from our web site:

http://www.intertanko.com/templates/intertanko/issue.aspx?id=47989

 

EU Sulphur Directive re 0.1% sulphur fuel in port – official transitional period for enforcement

The European Commission (EC) has adopted a Recommendation on the safe implementation of the use of low sulphur fuel by ships at berth in ports of the European Community, having recognised that “there may be operational problems and safety risks associated with the use of the required fuels in ships that have not undergone technical adaptations,”.

From 1 January 2010, ships at berth in European Community ports are required to use marine fuels with a sulphur content not exceeding 0.1% by mass (Article 4b of Directive 1999/32/EC as amended by Directive 2005/33/EC). This has not changed. However, in consideration of their recent safety concerns, the Commission adopted 21 December 2009 a Recommendation aimed at Member States, which invites them, while enforcing the Directive, to consider the existence of detailed evidence of the steps taken by ships to ensure safe compliance with the Directive. Member States may consider the existence of an approved retrofit plan when assessing the degree of penalties to be applied to non-complying ships.

The Recommendation indicates that, as part of the EU Member States’ enforcement actions against ships which fail to comply with the EU’s 0.1% sulphur fuel at berth requirement, they should request those ships to provide detailed evidence of the steps they are taking to achieve compliance. The Recommendation indicates that these retrofits should be completed within 8 months after the enforcement date.

 

The text of the European Commission Recommendation (to view click here) on the safe implementation of the use of low sulphur fuel by ships at berth, adopted on 21 December, was published in the Official Journal on 29 December.

 

For a summary and for INTERTANKO’S initial comments click here

 

For an unofficial list of the situation regarding transposition into law of the 0.1% sulphur requirement in EU/EEA States click here 

 

INTERTANKO intervention

INTERTANKO warmly welcomes this move, coming after five years of continuous pressure from INTERTANKO, OCIMF and others in the shipping industry to highlight the potential operational and safety problems of such a move.

If so requested by a Member during the transitional months, INTERTANKO is prepared to intervene directly with any government and/or any charterer creating a problem with any Member who has in place a programme and timeframe for compliance including a record of communication with boiler/machinery makers showing a plan for follow-up action. 

 

Hazard identification

As part of the detailed evidence required to ensure compliance with the EU Directive, we believe that tanker owners will be expected to provide a HAZID assessment document.  INTERTANKO and OCIMF have jointly published a Guidance booklet which provides a simple check list of items which should be part of a Risk Assessment and a Hazard Identification (HAZID) assessment for boiler systems in oil tankers covering the switching to, and long term-operation on, low sulphur marine gas oil (LSMGO).

It is strongly recommended that such a HAZID assessment be conducted in cooperation with the equipment/installation manufacturer or experienced entity and the classification society of each system type.

Click to view the Guidance for Hazard Identification

 

Charterparty Issues

Legislation regarding the reduction of sulphur in fuel is of course not new. Members are reminded of the INTERTANKO Model Clause on Bunker Emissions for Time Charters, developed when the low sulphur fuel requirements of MARPOL Annex VI came into force. When our Documentary Committee produced this clause, it also had the 2005 EU Sulphur Directive in its sights. 

This clause confirms that owners will meet the emission limits in MARPOL Annex VI and any similar laws or regulations, which would include the EU Sulphur Directive. Members may wish to amend the clause to mention this specifically.

The scheme of the clause means that the charterers have an obligation to provide the vessel with the fuel required to enable the vessel to comply with emission controls in the ECA. Failure to do so will be a breach by the charterers, who would then be liable to indemnify the owners for any resulting losses. Provided the charterers have supplied the requisite fuel, the responsibility to comply with the emissions control requirements rests with the owners. Overall it is the owners’ responsibility to ensure that the vessel is fit to trade and can do so safely within the trading limits laid down in the charterparty.

To view INTERTANKO’s Bunker Emission Clause for time charters click here

Our Documentary Committee is considering whether any amendment to this clause is required to reflect the particular practical issues involved with compliance with the EU Sulphur Directive. In the meantime we are happy to assist with the charterparty as well as the technical issues it raises. 



INTERTANKO 40th Anniversary   (2010-02-16 12:23)
New Chairman for INTERTANKO   (2009-11-13 05:45)
Search
Quick search
Advertisement