Menu:
Filepath: Saturday, July 04 2009



Forgot password?

Issues
Air emission/Annex VI
Air emission/GHGs
Bunkers
Chemical
AMSA revised Chemical Response Plan Best management practices for the control and reduction of “inadvertent” cargo vapour emissions from tankers Carbon monoxide levels during tank entry with coconut and veg oils CDI Chemical Contact Bulletins Chemical Tanker brochure Chemical Tanker Review Damage Stability Verification of Oil, Chemical and Gas Tankers - joint submission update EU acceptable previous cargo list Freight rates, ship values, bunker prices IMO updates Inert Gas debate & INTERTANKO Position MARPOL Annex II The Revisions OPRC-HNS Protocol Re-evaluation of cleaning chemical additives for cleaning cargo tanks Request for Line Draining Information (Survey) Tanker supply
Environment
Seventh annual shipping industry Tripartite meeting in Beijing IMO acts on marine noise pollution and ship strikes on whales Whale and Cetacean Conservation USCG Environmental Awareness Sewage Regulations VECS (Vapour Control) Environmental Projects Environmental Organisations IMO Meeting Papers Environmental Bulletins North American Issues Pollution Prevention Air Emission Antifouling paints Reception Facilities Ballast water
Human Element
Insurance
Legal and Documentary
Anti-trust/Competition Law Case Summaries
Acina - Shelltime 4 Afrapearl – Court of Appeal reverses first instance decision Alaska - New York Arbitration Alsternstern - The more hazardous the cargo, the more difficult to show seaworthiness Ambor/Once (the) - time charter - last voyage - Shelltime 4, Clause 19 considered Aniara - Charterers may cancel if tendering improper Archimidis – decision of the English High Court and Court of Appeal Asbatankvoy clause 8 - New York arbitration Cape Horn - guarantee on behalf of charterers’ holding company Count (the) - High Court - safe port warranty Diamond Park and Emerald Park – vetting issues discussed Doric Pride – vessel detained by U.S. authorities Elli and Frixos – decision of the English High Court Front Commander - Court of Appeal decision Golden Victory - House of Lords - assessment of damages Halki - Arbitration Clause - Construction - Application for stay of proceedings Halki - Case law update - Court of Appeal decision Happy Day - Allows owners' appeal and restores the award of the arbitrators Happy Day - Glencore Grain Limited v Flacker Shipping Limited Happy Day - NOR Hill Harmony - Court of Appeal upholds High Court decision on masters right to choose the route Hill Harmony - House of Lords - Master cannot ignore charterer's order on to the route to be taken - Court of Appeal Kriti Akti – Court of Appeal affirms High Court decision – Shelltime 3 – length of charter Li Hai – withdrawal from hire Liepaya - Recent English case law: Failure to give adequate notice of redelivery Loss not in parties’ contemplation Marika M - Whether vessel off-hire during period of repair Masters can decide route – recent decision of the English High Court Motis Exports - Court of Appeal upholder High Court decision - forged Bill of Lading New York arbitration decision – Asbatankvoy – foreseeability Nikmary - English Court of Appeal decision Obo Venture - Claims Clause Panalpine - What if English law had applied ? Peter Schmidt - Asbtatankvoy - Validity of NOR Peter Schmidt - Demurrage/laytime recent case law English Commercial Court Protank Orinoco - Cargo Retention Clause Ruhr Ore - Recent New York Arbitration decision - lightering/crew rest periods Seaflower - High Court - Rights of cancellation under vetting clause Stolt Spur - Vessel under multiple charters Voltaz - Whether demurrage claim time barred
Charter Party Advice Charter Party forms Charterers Clause EU Ship Source Pollution Directive litigation INTERTANKO Chartering Publications INTERTANKO Model Clauses INTERTANKO’s Freight and Demurrage Information Pool Law of the Sea: the challenge of unilateral measures v. uniform rules London Arbitration New ‘At A Glance’ Guide to pollution legislation Questions & Answers - various charterparties Tanker Chartering Seminars Useful links Washington State litigation
Marine safety
Navigation
Phase out
Piracy & What are we doing ?
Joint War Committee (JWC) Listed Areas Piracy – Industry Best Management Practices Arming of Merchant Ships, Security Forces & Mercenaries EUNAVFOR & The Maritime Security Centre - Horn of Africa (MSCHOA) Practical Measures to Avoid, Deter, and Delay Piracy Attacks in the Gulf of Aden – A Seafarers Guide What you Need to Know and Do Piracy in the Gulf of Aden - a summary of developments and practical feedback INTERTANKO's Piracy Precautions, Insurance & Legal Issues Security/Piracy Bulletin Service IMB Piracy Reports
Ports and Terminals
Research and Projects
SECA
Security
Abbreviations related to security Access of public authorities, emergency response and pilots AIS - Automatic Identification Systems Common approach by Round Table partners Company Security Officers (CSOs) – guidelines on training and certification Compliance on 1 July 2004 Continuous synopsis record (CSR) Crew Visas Declaration of Security (Dos) European Union Excessive terminal and crew restrictions Global integrated shipping information (GISIS) database IMO guidance for implementation of the ISPS Code Interface with FPSO/FSUs Interim certification INTERTANKO Model Clauses INTERTANKO Security Bulletin INTERTANKO to share security information with U.S. Coast Guard ISPS Code requirements for exercises Joint industry feedback form on maritime security Joint industry submissions to MSC79 Long Range Identification and Tracking (LRIT) Maritime Security into STCW Minimum requirements for the issue of certificates of proficiency for SSOs Navigation and vessel circulars (NVICS) North American Issues Obligation to notify flag states when exercising control and compliance measures Seafarers’ Identity Documents (SIDS) Security cost reflected in the 2006 Worldscale schedule Security included in STCW Convention Ship Security Alert System (SSAS) Ship security officer (SSO) Shore leave and access to ships Special Purpose Ships (SPS) Submission of vessel/facility security plan under MTSA Suppression of Unlawful Acts (SUA) – new protocols adopted The final rule Timely compliance U.S. standardises ID requirements for officials accessing vessels or facilities US ports - security status USCG Voluntary self-assessment by SOLAS Contracting Governments and port facilities Voluntary self-assessment checklist for Companies and CSOs
Technical
IACS CSR tracking database goes on line Protective coatings of dedicated seawater ballast tanks required in all types of ships and double-sided skin spaces of bulk carriers Newbuilding Standards: Extended guarantee/net-scantlings/corrosion margins Generic vs. ship specific corrosion allowances for existing ships Coating on cargo tanks Means of Access INTERTANKO Model Clauses FPSOs and FSUs - MARPOL Annex I Requirements Technical Projects Goal Based Standards IMO Meeting Papers USCG INTERTANKO/OCIMF/Class Discussions Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) Protection of Bunker Tanks North American Issues Bunkering - general Bunker Alerts Air Emission Tank Level and Pressure Monitoring (TLPM) Tanker Specification Awareness Guide Transparency
Vetting & port state control
Worldscale
 
Regions
Asia
Europe
North America
 
Benchmarking
TMSA2
Crew & Officer Retention
Lost Time Indicator (LTI)
 
Databases
Human Element Landscape Database
Port Information
Questionnaire 88
STS Database
Terminal Vetting Reports & Terminal Satisfaction Sheets
 
Various
Annual Tanker Event
Committees, councils and regional panels
Intertanko Presentations
Intranet (Staff Only)
Maritime Industry Knowledge Centre
Poseidon Challenge
Tanker Issues A-Z
Weekly NEWS
 
 
Mail present page to a friend Print present page

More Headlines
Tanker News
INTERTANKO’s welcome at release of Hebei Two tinged with disappointment at failure to exonerate
Published: 11 June 2009 13:37
Updated: 11 June 2009 13:44

INTERTANKO is delighted that Captain Jasprit Chawla and Chief Officer Syam Chetan, Master and Chief officer of the Hebei Spirit, have finally been released after being held in Korea for 550 days since the accident in December 2007, and will be returning home within days.

 

That these men were held for so long is unjust and unacceptable, and support for their case has come from a uniquely broad coalition of the shipping industry – the Round Table of international shipping associations (BIMCO, INTERCARGO, ICS, ISF and INTERTANKO), The International Group of P&I Clubs (IG), the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF), the Hong Kong Shipowners’ Association, InterManager, the International Maritime Employers’ Committee (IMEC) as well as the ship manager V.Ships and dozens of executives of international ship owning companies.

 

While we were pleased to see the Supreme Court reverse the Appeal Court’s decision to imprison these two officers in respect of the charges brought for destruction of the Hebei Spirit, we nevertheless remain surprised and disappointed at the decision to dismiss the appeal concerning the charges of pollution and to uphold the pollution fines. We are also dismayed that this pollution charge falls short of the ‘innocent of all charges’ verdict handed down by the Daejeon District Court in June 2008.

 

These two men acted in an exemplary manner during the Hebei Spirit incident, behaving in a way that was fully consistent with international tanker standards and practices which put the safety of seafarers first – as per the evidence given by INTERTANKO to the Supreme Court. We maintain that is unjust that these two men should have stains on their records when they should have been fully exonerated of blame and applauded for their behaviour.

 

We will therefore continue to back efforts to clear the names and reputations of these two men.


 

 INTERTANKO encourages IMO to set target levels to reduce GHG emissions

 

INTERTANKO encourages the early establishment by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) of target levels for the energy efficiency for new ships, in its recent submission to the upcoming IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee.

 

Setting such targets would become part of the discussions on the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) for new ships which is currently under consideration by the MEPC. Such targets would help the shipping industry to fit its work on reducing greenhouse gas emissions into the context of the global reductions which are under discussion at the IMO, and which will be centre stage at the COP 15* meetings (on climate change) in December this year in Copenhagen, where an ambitious global climate agreement is planned to be developed for the period from 2012 when the first commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol expires.

 

INTERTANKO is encouraging the IMO to set target levels as the competent international body regulating shipping, rather than having the COP15/UNFCCC meetings in Copenhagen dictate GHG target levels for shipping.

 

In the paper submitted recently to the MEPC (see attached), INTERTANKO strongly supports the ongoing development by the IMO of regulations that would result in measurable reductions of GHG emissions from ships. The IMO has already achieved a great deal of progress in this respect on both new and existing ships, despite the complexity of the issues involved. INTERTANKO hopes that the MEPC will maintain the powerful momentum that it has built up on this issue with further developments and agreements at its July meeting.

 

What does INTERTANKO’s support mean in practice? For new ships, INTERTANKO’s Members have been testing the IMO’s Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) formula and strongly support its application as soon as possible.

 

For existing ships, INTERTANKO has already developed a draft Ship Energy Management Plan (SEMP) specifically for tankers, based on the IMO’s Ship Energy Management Plan guide. A growing number of INTERTANKO members already apply operational measures aimed at improving ship’s fuel efficiency, and the tanker SEMP will facilitate a harmonised and comprehensive recording, monitoring and reporting of the results, all aimed at achieving a coordinated, efficient CO2 emissions reduction from tankers in service. Such operational measures already being actively investigated and applied by the shipping industry include more frequent hull/propeller cleaning, alternative coatings, better route planning, speed management.

 

It is a fact that tankers have become extremely energy efficient - for every litre of fuel burned in its main engine, today’s oil tanker transports its cargo twice as far as the same size ship 20 years ago. Achieving further large reductions in carbon emissions is challenging, and particularly hard at a time when the amount of oil transported in the international tanker trade has, up to last year, been growing steadily – the tonne-mile oil trade has increased by 66% this decade compared to the 1980s.

 

Therefore, INTERTANKO is working closely with the Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF) to see how owners can work with charterers to improve ship trading efficiency. We welcome the release by OCIMF of its Energy Efficiency and Fuel Management booklet which provides the basis for a voluntary approach between tanker operators and charterers in the joint planning of a ship’s voyage with a view to limiting CO2 emissions. We are working with OCIMF and others to establish a voluntary EEDI rating system for new ships which can start being used now.  

 

There has been much discussion as to whether Market Based Instruments (MBIs) (such as an emissions trading scheme, a bunker levy, an International GHG Compensation Fund) should be part of any regulation to reduce ship emissions. It is unclear whether such a move would be feasible in practice, with questions around enforcement, monitoring and lack of compliance when things occur beyond a ship’s control. On the other hand, target levels for new ships could be agreed and set in a relatively short time, and it will be possible in time to agree and set targets for existing ships. We believe that setting target levels for the energy efficiency of ships is the best route in practice to achieve tangible emission reductions.

 

Should MBIs be included as part of any regulatory package for the reduction of GHG emissions from ships, INTERTANKO strongly requests that the selection of any MBI be based upon whether the specific proposals meet INTERTANKO’s set of principles  which were adopted by its Council at its meeting last month in Tokyo (and which embody the IMO’s nine principles decided at MEPC 57), and which are included these in our recent submission to MEPC.

 

These principles state that a MBI scheme should be:

·         Governed by the IMO and be specific for the shipping industry

·         Effective in contributing to the reduction of total GHG emissions 

·         Environmentally sustainable without negative impact on global trade and growth

          (nor leading to competitive distortion nor

           disadvantaging   those operators or ships which   

          have already achieved significant GHG reductions)

·         Efficient and credible enforcement & monitoring

                  (practical, transparent, fraud-free and easy to administer

                    by the governing authority;               

                    compliance demonstrated through proper monitoring)

 

In addition, INTERTANKO remains wholeheartedly supportive of MARPOL Annex VI on air emissions from ships. North America’s proposed Emissions Control Area (ECA) is a positive step to further the aims of Annex VI. However we are concerned at the unilateral nature of Europe’s marine fuel sulphur Directive**  and in particular at the requirement for burning maximum 0.1% sulphur fuel at berth from January 2010 contained therein.  This requirement is not in line with internationally agreed rules and furthermore it is a safety risk. INTERTANKO emphasises the importance of the EU fully aligning itself with international regulation agreed in IMO, and doing so sooner rather than later to avoid operational confusion/unnecessary fuel switching and safety risks. (For further details, please see the attached joint statement from INTERTANKO and the Oil Companies International Marine Forum.)

 

( * the 15th Conference of Parties to the UNFCCC, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which is the UN organisation dealing with measures to reduce man-made emissions that result in climate change)

(** Directive 2005/33/EC of 6 July 2005 amending Directive 1999/32/EC)

 

+ + +

 

 

 


Search
Quick search
Advertisement