Menu:
Filepath: Intertanko / News Desk / Press Releases / Year 1998 / A Tale Of Eight Jetties: The Search For Adequate European Reception Facilities Wednesday, September 08 2010



Forgot password?

Issues
Air emission/Annex VI
Air emission/GHGs
Bunkers
Chemical
Environment
Clarifying China’s marine pollution regulations effective from 1 March 2010 Seventh annual shipping industry Tripartite meeting in Beijing IMO acts on marine noise pollution and ship strikes on whales Whale and Cetacean Conservation USCG Environmental Awareness Sewage Regulations VECS (Vapour Emission Control Systems) Environmental Projects Environmental Organisations Environmental Bulletins IMO Meeting Papers North American Issues Pollution Prevention Air Emission Antifouling paints Reception Facilities Ballast water
Human Element
Insurance
Legal and Documentary
Anti-trust/Competition Law Case Summaries
Achilleas – House of Lords gives certainty on damages for late redelivery Acina - Shelltime 4 Afrapearl – Court of Appeal reverses first instance decision 'Alaska' - New York Arbitration 'Alsternstern' - The more hazardous the cargo, the more difficult to show seaworthiness Ambor/Once (the) - time charter - last voyage - Shelltime 4, Clause 19 considered Aniara - Charterers may cancel if tendering improper Archimidis – decision of the English High Court and Court of Appeal Asbatankvoy Clause 8 - New York arbitration Cape Horn - guarantee on behalf of charterers’ holding company Count (the) - High Court - safe port warranty Diamond Park and Emerald Park – vetting issues discussed Doric Pride – vessel detained by U.S. authorities Elli and Frixos – decision of the English High Court Front Commander - Court of Appeal decision Golden Victory - House of Lords - assessment of damages Halki - Arbitration Clause - Construction - Application for stay of proceedings Halki - Case law update - Court of Appeal decision 'Happy Day' - Allows owners' appeal and restores the award of the arbitrators 'Happy Day' - Glencore Grain Limited v Flacker Shipping Limited Happy Day - NOR 'Hill Harmony' - Court of Appeal upholds High Court decision on master's right to choose the route Hill Harmony - House of Lords - Master cannot ignore charterer's order on to the route to be taken - Court of Appeal Kriti Akti – Court of Appeal affirms High Court decision – Shelltime 3 – length of charter Li Hai – withdrawal from hire Liepaya - Recent English case law: Failure to give adequate notice of redelivery Loss not in parties’ contemplation Marika M - Whether vessel off-hire during period of repair Masters can decide route – recent decision of the English High Court Motis Exports - Court of Appeal upholder High Court decision - forged Bill of Lading New York arbitration decision – Asbatankvoy – foreseeability Nikmary - English Court of Appeal decision Obo Venture - Claims Clause Panalpine - What if English law had applied ? Paragon – unenforceable penalty for late redelivery Peter Schmidt - Asbtatankvoy - Validity of NOR Peter Schmidt - Demurrage/laytime recent case law English Commercial Court Protank Orinoco - Cargo Retention Clause Ruhr Ore - Recent New York Arbitration decision - lightering/crew rest periods Sabrewing - Demurrage Time Bar Clauses Seaflower - High Court - Rights of cancellation under vetting clause Stolt Spur - Vessel under multiple charters Voltaz - Whether demurrage claim time barred
Charter Party Advice Charter Party forms Charterers Clause EU Ship Source Pollution Directive litigation INTERTANKO Chartering Publications INTERTANKO Model Clauses INTERTANKO’s Freight and Demurrage Information Pool Law of the Sea: the challenge of unilateral measures v. uniform rules London Arbitration New ‘At A Glance’ Guide to pollution legislation Questions & Answers - various charterparties Tanker Chartering Seminars Useful links Washington State litigation
Marine safety
Navigation
Phase out
Piracy
Ports and Terminals
Research and Projects
SECA
Security
Abbreviations related to security Access of public authorities, emergency response and pilots Common approach by Round Table partners Company Security Officers (CSOs) – guidelines on training and certification Compliance on 1 July 2004 Continuous Synopsis Record (CSR) Crew Visas Declaration of Security (DOS) European Union Excessive terminal and crew restrictions Global integrated shipping information (GISIS) database IMO guidance for implementation of the ISPS Code Interface with FPSO/FSUs Interim certification INTERTANKO involved in piracy awareness training initiative in the Philippines INTERTANKO Model Clauses INTERTANKO Security Bulletin INTERTANKO to share security information with U.S. Coast Guard ISPS Code requirements for exercises Joint industry feedback form on maritime security Joint industry submissions to MSC79 Long Range Identification and Tracking (LRIT) Maritime Security into STCW Minimum requirements for the issue of certificates of proficiency for SSOs Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circulars (NVICS) North American Issues Obligation to notify flag states when exercising control and compliance measures Seafarers’ Identity Documents (SIDS) Security cost reflected in the 2006 Worldscale schedule Security included in STCW Convention Ship Security Alert System (SSAS) Ship security officer (SSO) Shore leave and access to ships Special Purpose Ships (SPS) Submission of vessel/facility security plan under MTSA Suppression of Unlawful Acts (SUA) – new protocols adopted The final rule Timely ISPS Code compliance U.S. standardises ID requirements for officials accessing vessels or facilities US ports - security status USCG USCG releases Port Security Advisory on port facility security in Haiti Voluntary self-assessment by SOLAS Contracting Governments and port facilities Voluntary self-assessment checklist for Companies and CSOs
Technical
IACS CSR tracking database goes on line Protective coatings of dedicated seawater ballast tanks required in all types of ships and double-sided skin spaces of bulk carriers Means of Access INTERTANKO Model Clauses Technical Projects IMO Meeting Papers USCG INTERTANKO/OCIMF/Class Discussions North American Issues Bunkering - general Bunker Alerts Air Emissions Tank Level and Pressure Monitoring (TLPM) Systems Tanker Specification Awareness Guide Transparency Protection of Bunker Tanks FPSOs and FSUs - MARPOL Annex I Requirements Goal Based Standards Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) Newbuilding Standards: Extended guarantee/net-scantlings/corrosion margins Generic vs. ship specific corrosion allowances for existing ships Coating on cargo tanks
TOTS - An Introduction & Frequently Asked Questions
Vetting & Port State Control
Worldscale
 
Regions
Asia
Europe
North America
 
Benchmarking
Vessel Inspection Questionnaire (VIQ)
TMSA2
Crew & Officer Retention
Lost Time Indicator (LTI)
 
Databases
Confidential Accident Reporting Platform (CARP)
Human Element Landscape Database
Inspection Feedback Databases
Port Information
Questionnaire 88
STS Database
Terminal Vetting Reports & Terminal Satisfaction Sheets
 
Various
Annual Events
Committees, councils and regional panels
IMO submisssions
Intertanko Presentations
Intranet (Staff Only)
Maritime Industry Knowledge Centre
Poseidon Challenge
Tanker Issues A-Z
Weekly NEWS
 
 
Mail present page to a friend Print present page

A Tale Of Eight Jetties: The Search For Adequate European Reception Facilities
Published: 28 October 1998 00:00
Updated: 18 July 2006 15:11

Many tanker operators are active in the European short trades, and the region is well-known for its highly professional, very competitive and extremely efficient shipping services. Theoretically, the European shortsea trades should also be a thoroughly environment-friendly activity, due to the sophisticated nature of tanker design and operation, the power of the environmental lobby and the strict regulatory regime that is in place. After having been instrumental in its creation, European nations have ratified the 1973/78 Marine Pollution (MARPOL) Convention which specifies, amongst other things, that signatories must provide adequate shore reception facilities for shipboard wastes. Unfortunately, as the Short Sea Tanker Group proved when analysing a recent actual tanker voyage (highlighted below), many European nations have not fulfilled their obligation to provide adequate reception facilities. This has compromised the environmental performance of tankers in the European trades.

During a port call at Milford Haven on 20 August 1998 the tanker Green Spirit sought to deliver its engine room sludge to a shore reception facility. However, there was no response to this request from the terminal at which the ship was berthed. Green Spirit then proceeded to Belfast in Northern Ireland, where the master was told that an expensive and time-consuming shift to a different berth within the port would enable the sludge to be discharged ashore. However, profit margins are low and time is precious in the European shortsea trades. As the ship was to proceed direct to Norway, home country of the "World Environmental Queen", Gro Harlem Brundtland, it was decided to hold onto the sludge until then. No doubt the small port of Sola on the south west coast of Norway would have prime facilities to receive the heavy sludge.

On arrival in Sola on 29 August, Green Spirit was informed by the shore terminal that no reception facilities were available. The master was not discouraged, however, because the next port of call was Mongstad, location of a modern oil refinery and terminal complex that was so expensive to build, that the first Statoil MD had to resign his position. At the Mongstad terminal, that is promoted as an "Enviromental Leader", Green Spirit was told that delivery of the sludge ashore would have to take place after cargo loading and bunkering had been completed. Bunkering started late on 2 September, and was completed around midnight. This was not unusual as shipboard life in the shortsea oil trades often means working around the clock. At this point, however, the terminal announced that it would be unable to receive the sludge ashore. Difficulties were being experienced in connecting the shoreside loading arm and the hose "because the ship was too deeply loaded". Receiving this information too late to take any remedial action, the ship's crew reported that the response seemed to be pure delaying tactics on the part of the terminal.

Next port of call for Green Spirit was West Thurrock on the River Thames in the UK - not all oil ports are big, well-known names. Arriving on the night of 5 September, the tanker was told once again that there were no appropriate reception facilities available. The ship did not fare much better the next day because, after a move along the river to the Coryton refinery, the master was informed that, at that time, no suitable facilities were available at the terminal itself. The master was faced with two options - either discharge the sludge to a barge, an expensive alternative, or wait until the next port of call - an oil terminal on the Hamble Estuary near Southampton - where his ship was due in a few days. Something would have to be done soon as the volume of sludge was mounting.

As it turned out, it did not matter very much that Green Spirit would have been unable to discharge the engine room waste ashore at the Hamble terminal, again due to the much-quoted "lack of available facilities". As often happens in the tanker business, the master was given new orders and told to sail direct to Rotterdam, the largest tanker port in the world, from the River Thames. After being informed that there were no sludge-handling facilities at the particular Rotterdam terminal to which Green Spirit was destined, the tanker's agent organised for a barge to be brought alongside when she arrived in port. Eventually, 19 days after the first attempt to discharge the waste ashore, the tanker pumped 15 cubic metres of engine room sludge at a price of $ 7,000 to a Rotterdam slop barge.

As one of the key contributors to its development, INTERTANKO fully supports the European Commission's new draft Directive on Reception Facilities for Ship-generated Wastes and Cargo Residues. It is hoped that implementation of the initiative will facilitate the operation of tankers in the European shortsea trades by providing adequate reception facilities in all relevant oil ports at reasonable cost and in a manner which encourages their use. Too often, shortsea tanker operators have met with evasion tactics and exorbitant costs when seeking to deliver engine room sludge and other MARPOL wastes ashore.






Search
Quick search
Advertisement