Menu:
Filepath: Intertanko / News Desk / Press Releases / Year 2007 / Tanker Shipping: energy-efficient and environmentally-friendly Friday, September 10 2010



Forgot password?

Issues
Air emission/Annex VI
Air emission/GHGs
Bunkers
Chemical
Environment
Clarifying China’s marine pollution regulations effective from 1 March 2010 Seventh annual shipping industry Tripartite meeting in Beijing IMO acts on marine noise pollution and ship strikes on whales Whale and Cetacean Conservation USCG Environmental Awareness Sewage Regulations VECS (Vapour Emission Control Systems) Environmental Projects Environmental Organisations Environmental Bulletins IMO Meeting Papers North American Issues Pollution Prevention Air Emission Antifouling paints Reception Facilities Ballast water
Human Element
Insurance
Legal and Documentary
Anti-trust/Competition Law Case Summaries
Achilleas – House of Lords gives certainty on damages for late redelivery Acina - Shelltime 4 Afrapearl – Court of Appeal reverses first instance decision 'Alaska' - New York Arbitration 'Alsternstern' - The more hazardous the cargo, the more difficult to show seaworthiness Ambor/Once (the) - time charter - last voyage - Shelltime 4, Clause 19 considered Aniara - Charterers may cancel if tendering improper Archimidis – decision of the English High Court and Court of Appeal Asbatankvoy Clause 8 - New York arbitration Cape Horn - guarantee on behalf of charterers’ holding company Count (the) - High Court - safe port warranty Diamond Park and Emerald Park – vetting issues discussed Doric Pride – vessel detained by U.S. authorities Elli and Frixos – decision of the English High Court Front Commander - Court of Appeal decision Golden Victory - House of Lords - assessment of damages Halki - Arbitration Clause - Construction - Application for stay of proceedings Halki - Case law update - Court of Appeal decision 'Happy Day' - Allows owners' appeal and restores the award of the arbitrators 'Happy Day' - Glencore Grain Limited v Flacker Shipping Limited Happy Day - NOR 'Hill Harmony' - Court of Appeal upholds High Court decision on master's right to choose the route Hill Harmony - House of Lords - Master cannot ignore charterer's order on to the route to be taken - Court of Appeal Kriti Akti – Court of Appeal affirms High Court decision – Shelltime 3 – length of charter Li Hai – withdrawal from hire Liepaya - Recent English case law: Failure to give adequate notice of redelivery Loss not in parties’ contemplation Marika M - Whether vessel off-hire during period of repair Masters can decide route – recent decision of the English High Court Motis Exports - Court of Appeal upholder High Court decision - forged Bill of Lading New York arbitration decision – Asbatankvoy – foreseeability Nikmary - English Court of Appeal decision Obo Venture - Claims Clause Panalpine - What if English law had applied ? Paragon – unenforceable penalty for late redelivery Peter Schmidt - Asbtatankvoy - Validity of NOR Peter Schmidt - Demurrage/laytime recent case law English Commercial Court Protank Orinoco - Cargo Retention Clause Ruhr Ore - Recent New York Arbitration decision - lightering/crew rest periods Sabrewing - Demurrage Time Bar Clauses Seaflower - High Court - Rights of cancellation under vetting clause Stolt Spur - Vessel under multiple charters Voltaz - Whether demurrage claim time barred
Charter Party Advice Charter Party forms Charterers Clause EU Ship Source Pollution Directive litigation INTERTANKO Chartering Publications INTERTANKO Model Clauses INTERTANKO’s Freight and Demurrage Information Pool Law of the Sea: the challenge of unilateral measures v. uniform rules London Arbitration New ‘At A Glance’ Guide to pollution legislation Questions & Answers - various charterparties Tanker Chartering Seminars Useful links Washington State litigation
Marine safety
Navigation
Phase out
Piracy
Ports and Terminals
Research and Projects
SECA
Security
Abbreviations related to security Access of public authorities, emergency response and pilots Common approach by Round Table partners Company Security Officers (CSOs) – guidelines on training and certification Compliance on 1 July 2004 Continuous Synopsis Record (CSR) Crew Visas Declaration of Security (DOS) European Union Excessive terminal and crew restrictions Global integrated shipping information (GISIS) database IMO guidance for implementation of the ISPS Code Interface with FPSO/FSUs Interim certification INTERTANKO involved in piracy awareness training initiative in the Philippines INTERTANKO Model Clauses INTERTANKO Security Bulletin INTERTANKO to share security information with U.S. Coast Guard ISPS Code requirements for exercises Joint industry feedback form on maritime security Joint industry submissions to MSC79 Long Range Identification and Tracking (LRIT) Maritime Security into STCW Minimum requirements for the issue of certificates of proficiency for SSOs Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circulars (NVICS) North American Issues Obligation to notify flag states when exercising control and compliance measures Seafarers’ Identity Documents (SIDS) Security cost reflected in the 2006 Worldscale schedule Security included in STCW Convention Ship Security Alert System (SSAS) Ship security officer (SSO) Shore leave and access to ships Special Purpose Ships (SPS) Submission of vessel/facility security plan under MTSA Suppression of Unlawful Acts (SUA) – new protocols adopted The final rule Timely ISPS Code compliance U.S. standardises ID requirements for officials accessing vessels or facilities US ports - security status USCG USCG releases Port Security Advisory on port facility security in Haiti Voluntary self-assessment by SOLAS Contracting Governments and port facilities Voluntary self-assessment checklist for Companies and CSOs
Technical
IACS CSR tracking database goes on line Protective coatings of dedicated seawater ballast tanks required in all types of ships and double-sided skin spaces of bulk carriers Means of Access INTERTANKO Model Clauses Technical Projects IMO Meeting Papers USCG INTERTANKO/OCIMF/Class Discussions North American Issues Bunkering - general Bunker Alerts Air Emissions Tank Level and Pressure Monitoring (TLPM) Systems Tanker Specification Awareness Guide Transparency Protection of Bunker Tanks FPSOs and FSUs - MARPOL Annex I Requirements Goal Based Standards Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) Newbuilding Standards: Extended guarantee/net-scantlings/corrosion margins Generic vs. ship specific corrosion allowances for existing ships Coating on cargo tanks
TOTS - An Introduction & Frequently Asked Questions
Vetting & Port State Control
Worldscale
 
Regions
Asia
Europe
North America
 
Benchmarking
Vessel Inspection Questionnaire (VIQ)
TMSA2
Crew & Officer Retention
Lost Time Indicator (LTI)
 
Databases
Confidential Accident Reporting Platform (CARP)
Human Element Landscape Database
Inspection Feedback Databases
Port Information
Questionnaire 88
STS Database
Terminal Vetting Reports & Terminal Satisfaction Sheets
 
Various
Annual Events
Committees, councils and regional panels
IMO submisssions
Intertanko Presentations
Intranet (Staff Only)
Maritime Industry Knowledge Centre
Poseidon Challenge
Tanker Issues A-Z
Weekly NEWS
 
 
Mail present page to a friend Print present page

Tanker Shipping: energy-efficient and environmentally-friendly
Published: 22 October 2007 18:49
Updated: 23 October 2007 12:12

Press Release
INTERTANKO - the International Association of Independent Tanker Owners
 

Tanker Shipping

 

Oil tankers transport over 2.4 billion tonnes of oil annually. Getting on for two thirds of the oil and oil products that the world consumes is transported by sea. Oil tankers are environmentally-friendly, energy-efficient and effective in terms of minimising greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions.

 

One litre of fuel on a modern VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier) moves one tonne of cargo more than 2,800 kilometres; this is more than twice as far as 20 years ago. The average carbon footprint (in terms of CO2 per tonne-kilometre) of each of the world’s oil tankers is less than one tenth of that of a heavy truck and less than one hundredth of that of an aircraft.

 

World shipping carries 90% of world trade and modern bulk carriers, container ships and other cargo ships, – supplying the world with energy, moving raw materials and shipping finished goods – are similarly environment-friendly and energy-efficient.

 

Over recent years tanker owners have invested an average of nearly $32bn a year in new ships and today over 75 percent of the internationally traded fleet is double hulled. With this increased protection for the oil cargo, as well as the ship’s fuel tanks, accidental oil spills this decade have been at record low levels - one third of the previous decade and one tenth of the 1970s - at a time when oil transported has more than doubled since the mid 1980s. Engines are more efficient and other measures, such as segregated ballast water, the application of new tin-free paints, optimal weather routing and the recovery of otherwise wasted heat from the engine and auxiliaries, have resulted in significant gains in energy efficiency and reductions in environmental impact.

 

A particular issue for the tanker industry has been the control of cargo vapours (volatile organic compounds - VOCs) during loading and on passage. VOCs have a global warming potential of approximately 20 times that of CO2 and the tanker fleet has voluntarily developed means to reduce these emissions to a small fraction of what they were.

 

Tanker owners are however not complacent and are committed to “continuous improvement” in all fields right across the industry. New technologies are being tested for application in both existing and new ships, including ways of achieving further efficiency gains and reducing harmful engine exhaust and GHG emissions.

 

 

Air Emissions

 

Air emissions from ships are regulated by the United Nations’ International Maritime Organization (IMO).

 

In 1997 an International Convention on the Regulation of Air Pollution from Ships (MARPOL Annex VI) was adopted. This Convention covers the emissions of oxides of sulphur (SOx) and nitrogen (NOx) as well CFCs and VOCs, and makes provisions for regional control zones for sulphur emissions.

 

As early as 2000 the IMO produced a study on Green House Gas (GHG) emissions and is currently working on an update to give a better foundation for future decisions. Additional measures to regulate GHG emissions are under review and will be debated more fully in the first half of 2008.

 

Sulphur levels in most fuels used today by ships average just 60% of the maximum permissible level in the IMO regulations. Within Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECAs), currently covering the Baltic Sea and from November the North Sea and English Channel, where maximum sulphur levels are set at one third of the global level, the sulphur level of the fuels used by ships is frequently below the maximum permissible level. Since 2000 all new engines installed on ships also produce significantly lower NOx emissions.

 

This Convention is currently being revised with a target completion date of 2008.

 

INTERTANKO has submitted a specific proposal to the IMO which would require the use of cleaner fuel (distillate) on a global basis. Other (shorter and longer term) proposals under review include the application of abatement technologies and/or the expansion of Emission Control areas.

 

In order to fast-track the revision of Annex VI, the IMO has endorsed a proposal by its  Secretary-General and has commissioned a comprehensive study, by an informal cross- government/industry Group of Experts, to evaluate the effects of the various proposals for revisions and establish the facts.

 

Inputs on current and future fuel consumption and emissions were invited by the IMO’s Group of Experts, whose members, although nominated by inter alia governments, oil and bunkering interests, engine manufacturers and ship owner representatives, serve the Group in their personal capacity. One of several such inputs was a report by INTERTANKO which included a model for estimating the global usage of marine fuels by ships subject to Annex VI regulations and their associated emissions, together with an explanatory note of the underlying assumptions in the model. This report makes no comparison with either estimates of previous years or with other transportation modes. The Group of Experts is responsible for making any comparisons with other models as part of the process of validation for its final report.

 

INTERTANKO will not comment on the contents of its report, the ongoing work of the IMO Group of Experts  nor on speculation about the total or mix of emissions from shipping.

 

Regrettably, despite understandings with regard to the confidentiality of the work of the IMO Group of Experts, a third party (not INTERTANKO) has chosen to release the input provided by INTERTANKO and subsequently various press articles and comments have appeared out of context and in advance of the publication of the IMO Group of Experts’ report in December.

 

Recent press articles do not reflect the official position of INTERTANKO. Respecting these understandings on confidentiality, we consider it inappropriate to make specific comments while the work of the IMO’s Group of Experts is under way.

 

 

Growth in World Trade

 

World trade and ship numbers have naturally seen a steady increase over recent years, but in parallel there have been economies of scale (with larger, more efficient ships) and on a per unit basis emissions both of harmful substances (pollutants) and GHGs from ships have been reduced, allowing shipping still justifiably to assert that it is the most environmentally-friendly and the most energy-efficient transport mode.

 

Shipping is therefore a part of the solution to the challenges of air emissions and global warming which face the world today, rather than being the problem.

 

Tanker owners, and INTERTANKO, are totally committed to remaining at the forefront in providing the world with safe, environmentally sound and efficient seaborne transportation of oil, gas and chemical products.

 

 

Contacts:

 

Dr Peter Swift, Managing Director, INTERTANKO +44 20 7977 7010

peter.swift@intertanko.com

 

Bill Box, Communications and Public Relations Manager, INTERTANKO +44 20 7977 7023

bill.box@intertanko.com


Search
Quick search
Advertisement