Menu:
Filepath: Intertanko / News Desk / Press Releases / Year 2008 / Why the regulators should mandate global use of MDO Wednesday, September 08 2010



Forgot password?

Issues
Air emission/Annex VI
Air emission/GHGs
Bunkers
Chemical
Environment
Clarifying China’s marine pollution regulations effective from 1 March 2010 Seventh annual shipping industry Tripartite meeting in Beijing IMO acts on marine noise pollution and ship strikes on whales Whale and Cetacean Conservation USCG Environmental Awareness Sewage Regulations VECS (Vapour Emission Control Systems) Environmental Projects Environmental Organisations Environmental Bulletins IMO Meeting Papers North American Issues Pollution Prevention Air Emission Antifouling paints Reception Facilities Ballast water
Human Element
Insurance
Legal and Documentary
Anti-trust/Competition Law Case Summaries
Achilleas – House of Lords gives certainty on damages for late redelivery Acina - Shelltime 4 Afrapearl – Court of Appeal reverses first instance decision 'Alaska' - New York Arbitration 'Alsternstern' - The more hazardous the cargo, the more difficult to show seaworthiness Ambor/Once (the) - time charter - last voyage - Shelltime 4, Clause 19 considered Aniara - Charterers may cancel if tendering improper Archimidis – decision of the English High Court and Court of Appeal Asbatankvoy Clause 8 - New York arbitration Cape Horn - guarantee on behalf of charterers’ holding company Count (the) - High Court - safe port warranty Diamond Park and Emerald Park – vetting issues discussed Doric Pride – vessel detained by U.S. authorities Elli and Frixos – decision of the English High Court Front Commander - Court of Appeal decision Golden Victory - House of Lords - assessment of damages Halki - Arbitration Clause - Construction - Application for stay of proceedings Halki - Case law update - Court of Appeal decision 'Happy Day' - Allows owners' appeal and restores the award of the arbitrators 'Happy Day' - Glencore Grain Limited v Flacker Shipping Limited Happy Day - NOR 'Hill Harmony' - Court of Appeal upholds High Court decision on master's right to choose the route Hill Harmony - House of Lords - Master cannot ignore charterer's order on to the route to be taken - Court of Appeal Kriti Akti – Court of Appeal affirms High Court decision – Shelltime 3 – length of charter Li Hai – withdrawal from hire Liepaya - Recent English case law: Failure to give adequate notice of redelivery Loss not in parties’ contemplation Marika M - Whether vessel off-hire during period of repair Masters can decide route – recent decision of the English High Court Motis Exports - Court of Appeal upholder High Court decision - forged Bill of Lading New York arbitration decision – Asbatankvoy – foreseeability Nikmary - English Court of Appeal decision Obo Venture - Claims Clause Panalpine - What if English law had applied ? Paragon – unenforceable penalty for late redelivery Peter Schmidt - Asbtatankvoy - Validity of NOR Peter Schmidt - Demurrage/laytime recent case law English Commercial Court Protank Orinoco - Cargo Retention Clause Ruhr Ore - Recent New York Arbitration decision - lightering/crew rest periods Sabrewing - Demurrage Time Bar Clauses Seaflower - High Court - Rights of cancellation under vetting clause Stolt Spur - Vessel under multiple charters Voltaz - Whether demurrage claim time barred
Charter Party Advice Charter Party forms Charterers Clause EU Ship Source Pollution Directive litigation INTERTANKO Chartering Publications INTERTANKO Model Clauses INTERTANKO’s Freight and Demurrage Information Pool Law of the Sea: the challenge of unilateral measures v. uniform rules London Arbitration New ‘At A Glance’ Guide to pollution legislation Questions & Answers - various charterparties Tanker Chartering Seminars Useful links Washington State litigation
Marine safety
Navigation
Phase out
Piracy
Ports and Terminals
Research and Projects
SECA
Security
Abbreviations related to security Access of public authorities, emergency response and pilots Common approach by Round Table partners Company Security Officers (CSOs) – guidelines on training and certification Compliance on 1 July 2004 Continuous Synopsis Record (CSR) Crew Visas Declaration of Security (DOS) European Union Excessive terminal and crew restrictions Global integrated shipping information (GISIS) database IMO guidance for implementation of the ISPS Code Interface with FPSO/FSUs Interim certification INTERTANKO involved in piracy awareness training initiative in the Philippines INTERTANKO Model Clauses INTERTANKO Security Bulletin INTERTANKO to share security information with U.S. Coast Guard ISPS Code requirements for exercises Joint industry feedback form on maritime security Joint industry submissions to MSC79 Long Range Identification and Tracking (LRIT) Maritime Security into STCW Minimum requirements for the issue of certificates of proficiency for SSOs Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circulars (NVICS) North American Issues Obligation to notify flag states when exercising control and compliance measures Seafarers’ Identity Documents (SIDS) Security cost reflected in the 2006 Worldscale schedule Security included in STCW Convention Ship Security Alert System (SSAS) Ship security officer (SSO) Shore leave and access to ships Special Purpose Ships (SPS) Submission of vessel/facility security plan under MTSA Suppression of Unlawful Acts (SUA) – new protocols adopted The final rule Timely ISPS Code compliance U.S. standardises ID requirements for officials accessing vessels or facilities US ports - security status USCG USCG releases Port Security Advisory on port facility security in Haiti Voluntary self-assessment by SOLAS Contracting Governments and port facilities Voluntary self-assessment checklist for Companies and CSOs
Technical
IACS CSR tracking database goes on line Protective coatings of dedicated seawater ballast tanks required in all types of ships and double-sided skin spaces of bulk carriers Means of Access INTERTANKO Model Clauses Technical Projects IMO Meeting Papers USCG INTERTANKO/OCIMF/Class Discussions North American Issues Bunkering - general Bunker Alerts Air Emissions Tank Level and Pressure Monitoring (TLPM) Systems Tanker Specification Awareness Guide Transparency Protection of Bunker Tanks FPSOs and FSUs - MARPOL Annex I Requirements Goal Based Standards Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) Newbuilding Standards: Extended guarantee/net-scantlings/corrosion margins Generic vs. ship specific corrosion allowances for existing ships Coating on cargo tanks
TOTS - An Introduction & Frequently Asked Questions
Vetting & Port State Control
Worldscale
 
Regions
Asia
Europe
North America
 
Benchmarking
Vessel Inspection Questionnaire (VIQ)
TMSA2
Crew & Officer Retention
Lost Time Indicator (LTI)
 
Databases
Confidential Accident Reporting Platform (CARP)
Human Element Landscape Database
Inspection Feedback Databases
Port Information
Questionnaire 88
STS Database
Terminal Vetting Reports & Terminal Satisfaction Sheets
 
Various
Annual Events
Committees, councils and regional panels
IMO submisssions
Intertanko Presentations
Intranet (Staff Only)
Maritime Industry Knowledge Centre
Poseidon Challenge
Tanker Issues A-Z
Weekly NEWS
 
 
Mail present page to a friend Print present page

Why the regulators should mandate global use of MDO
Published: 04 February 2008 11:50
Updated: 04 February 2008 11:51

Executive Summary

Key messages

 

·         The distillates option addresses the root cause of SOx/PM emissions and partially of NOx emissions

 

·         The distillates option improves operational efficiency and ship safety in ports

 

·         The distillates option brings shipping in line with the rest of the transportation industry (air, road, rail)

 

·         The distillates option is a truly international option that sets one global standard

 

·         In addition to cleaner air, distillates leads to cleaner seas

 

The Distillates Option

 

In response to the IMO’s initiative to revise MARPOL Annex VI on air emissions from ships, INTERTANKO recommends that SOx, NOx and  Particulate Matter (PM) emissions from ships can be further reduced by mandating the global use of Marine Diesel Oil (MDO) and including a specification for this fuel in the revised MARPOL Annex VI regulations. INTERTANKO further suggests that the specification of the mandated fuel should be a slightly modified specification for the ISO 8217 DMB grade, with an initial sulphur content of maximum 1.0% with a later reduction to 0.50% subject to product availability. This may be summarised as the Distillates Option.

 

Furthermore INTERTANKO recommends a mandatory global low sulphur cap on the fuel used by ships which removes the need of SECAs.  This will ease implementation, bring global uniformity to the regulations, promote safety, efficiency and simplicity to ship operations, and bring a straight-forward element to law enforcement and monitoring.

 

Conclusions

 

INTERTANKO represents the interests of its members in the Annex VI revision discussion. The regulatory requirement for cleaner ships will soon be forced on the shipping industry if, collectively, the industry does not take a strong, proactive position. 

 

The distillate solution does exactly this by solving the root cause of the problem rather than trying only to reduce the effect of the problem.

 

INTERTANKO is truly representing what is best for the environment as a whole.

1 Environment = 1 Solution.

 

The mandatory global use of a low sulphur MDO/DMB grade is a simple, straightforward and realistic requirement which would ensure:

 

          A long-term and positive reduction of air emissions (SOx, PM, NOx) from ships

          The overall environmental impact for across-the-board emissions reductions is better than that of any of the current alternative measures

          The saving of CO2 emissions by eliminating shipboard HFO treatment and scrubber operation, which would counterbalance CO2 emissions from refineries for extra distillate production

          The prevention of fragmented regulations (a global standard for deep sea, coastal and at berth vessels)

          A long-term and predictable regulatory regime with simpler and more workable monitoring and control procedures

          A solid platform of requirements through international IMO standards

          Safer and simpler ship operations with few and manageable technical modifications

          A better work environment for crews

          A reduction in waste materials, for the disposal of which the ship owner is responsible

          The removal of quality problems with residual fuels

          Coastal/sea pollution from MDO bunker spills is significantly less harmful and easier to clean up than fuel oil

 

Based on all the advantages presented, INTERTANKO believes the best solution is a global mandate for a specifically-defined low sulphur marine distillate fuel to achieve significant reductions in air emissions.  This will, at the same time, open up opportunities for engine manufacturers to find innovative, simple and efficient solutions for further reductions of air emissions from ships, including CO2 emissions.

 

INTERTANKO believes the best and safest practices and policies are those where each industry is required to do what it is designed and expected to do.

 

The refining industry should provide efficient and clean low-sulphur marine fuels.

The shipping industry should concentrate on safe and efficient transportation operations. The engine manufacturing industry should then develop efficient technologies to improve ships’ energy efficiency.

 

Shipping should not concentrate on treating residual fuels to make them fit for use and then purifying the emissions. Using ships as waste management plants is an obstacle to innovation that could achieve further reductions of air emissions from ships and further increases in ships’ energy efficiency, including reduction of CO2 emissions.

 

  • The use of MDO will be part of a holistic set of measures to reduce air emissions from ships.
  • The use of MDO offers a common-sense, immediate and global opportunity to significantly reduce emissions from ships.
  • The use of MDO facilitates innovation and the use of sophisticated technologies for further and future emission reductions from ships.
  • The use of MDO will align shipping with other means of transportation.

 

24 January, 2008.

 

 

Key questions: (with responses and INTERTANKO’s conclusions)

- Would a mandatory global low sulphur cap work?

- What are the advantages of the Distillates Option?

- What are the alternatives to the Distillates Option?

- How can these benefits/advantages of using MDO be demonstrated? 

    * Environmental advantages

    * Safety benefits

    * Advantages for rule enforcement and rule monitoring

    * Technical advantages

    * Operational benefits

    * Better marine fuel quality

 

Click here for key questions and answers

 

 

A number of additional questions: (with answers and conclusions)

- What is the availability of marine distillates fuels and of abatement technology?

- What are the cost implications to refineries and to ship owners?

- How are CO2 emissions from refineries related to the production of additional   

    volumes of marine distillate fuels?

 

Click here for additional questions and answers

 

 

Click here for full paper ‘Why the regulators should mandate global use of MDO’

 

 

INTERTANKO Contacts for any more questions:

 

Peter Swift, Managing Director peter.swift@intertanko.com  +44 20 7977 7010

 

Joe Angelo, Deputy Managing Director joseph.angelo@intertanko.com +1 703 373 2269

 

Dragos Rauta, Technical Director dragos.rauta@intertanko.com  +47 22 122 650

 

Bill Box, Communications and Public Relations Manager bill.box@intertanko.com +44 20 7977 7023


Search
Quick search
Advertisement