Menu:
Filepath: Intertanko / News Desk / Press Releases / Year 2009 / INTERTANKO builds on IMO process with policy statement on GHG emissions from shipping Friday, September 10 2010



Forgot password?

Issues
Air emission/Annex VI
Air emission/GHGs
Bunkers
Chemical
Environment
Clarifying China’s marine pollution regulations effective from 1 March 2010 Seventh annual shipping industry Tripartite meeting in Beijing IMO acts on marine noise pollution and ship strikes on whales Whale and Cetacean Conservation USCG Environmental Awareness Sewage Regulations VECS (Vapour Emission Control Systems) Environmental Projects Environmental Organisations Environmental Bulletins IMO Meeting Papers North American Issues Pollution Prevention Air Emission Antifouling paints Reception Facilities Ballast water
Human Element
Insurance
Legal and Documentary
Anti-trust/Competition Law Case Summaries
Achilleas – House of Lords gives certainty on damages for late redelivery Acina - Shelltime 4 Afrapearl – Court of Appeal reverses first instance decision 'Alaska' - New York Arbitration 'Alsternstern' - The more hazardous the cargo, the more difficult to show seaworthiness Ambor/Once (the) - time charter - last voyage - Shelltime 4, Clause 19 considered Aniara - Charterers may cancel if tendering improper Archimidis – decision of the English High Court and Court of Appeal Asbatankvoy Clause 8 - New York arbitration Cape Horn - guarantee on behalf of charterers’ holding company Count (the) - High Court - safe port warranty Diamond Park and Emerald Park – vetting issues discussed Doric Pride – vessel detained by U.S. authorities Elli and Frixos – decision of the English High Court Front Commander - Court of Appeal decision Golden Victory - House of Lords - assessment of damages Halki - Arbitration Clause - Construction - Application for stay of proceedings Halki - Case law update - Court of Appeal decision 'Happy Day' - Allows owners' appeal and restores the award of the arbitrators 'Happy Day' - Glencore Grain Limited v Flacker Shipping Limited Happy Day - NOR 'Hill Harmony' - Court of Appeal upholds High Court decision on master's right to choose the route Hill Harmony - House of Lords - Master cannot ignore charterer's order on to the route to be taken - Court of Appeal Kriti Akti – Court of Appeal affirms High Court decision – Shelltime 3 – length of charter Li Hai – withdrawal from hire Liepaya - Recent English case law: Failure to give adequate notice of redelivery Loss not in parties’ contemplation Marika M - Whether vessel off-hire during period of repair Masters can decide route – recent decision of the English High Court Motis Exports - Court of Appeal upholder High Court decision - forged Bill of Lading New York arbitration decision – Asbatankvoy – foreseeability Nikmary - English Court of Appeal decision Obo Venture - Claims Clause Panalpine - What if English law had applied ? Paragon – unenforceable penalty for late redelivery Peter Schmidt - Asbtatankvoy - Validity of NOR Peter Schmidt - Demurrage/laytime recent case law English Commercial Court Protank Orinoco - Cargo Retention Clause Ruhr Ore - Recent New York Arbitration decision - lightering/crew rest periods Sabrewing - Demurrage Time Bar Clauses Seaflower - High Court - Rights of cancellation under vetting clause Stolt Spur - Vessel under multiple charters Voltaz - Whether demurrage claim time barred
Charter Party Advice Charter Party forms Charterers Clause EU Ship Source Pollution Directive litigation INTERTANKO Chartering Publications INTERTANKO Model Clauses INTERTANKO’s Freight and Demurrage Information Pool Law of the Sea: the challenge of unilateral measures v. uniform rules London Arbitration New ‘At A Glance’ Guide to pollution legislation Questions & Answers - various charterparties Tanker Chartering Seminars Useful links Washington State litigation
Marine safety
Navigation
Phase out
Piracy
Ports and Terminals
Research and Projects
SECA
Security
Abbreviations related to security Access of public authorities, emergency response and pilots Common approach by Round Table partners Company Security Officers (CSOs) – guidelines on training and certification Compliance on 1 July 2004 Continuous Synopsis Record (CSR) Crew Visas Declaration of Security (DOS) European Union Excessive terminal and crew restrictions Global integrated shipping information (GISIS) database IMO guidance for implementation of the ISPS Code Interface with FPSO/FSUs Interim certification INTERTANKO involved in piracy awareness training initiative in the Philippines INTERTANKO Model Clauses INTERTANKO Security Bulletin INTERTANKO to share security information with U.S. Coast Guard ISPS Code requirements for exercises Joint industry feedback form on maritime security Joint industry submissions to MSC79 Long Range Identification and Tracking (LRIT) Maritime Security into STCW Minimum requirements for the issue of certificates of proficiency for SSOs Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circulars (NVICS) North American Issues Obligation to notify flag states when exercising control and compliance measures Seafarers’ Identity Documents (SIDS) Security cost reflected in the 2006 Worldscale schedule Security included in STCW Convention Ship Security Alert System (SSAS) Ship security officer (SSO) Shore leave and access to ships Special Purpose Ships (SPS) Submission of vessel/facility security plan under MTSA Suppression of Unlawful Acts (SUA) – new protocols adopted The final rule Timely ISPS Code compliance U.S. standardises ID requirements for officials accessing vessels or facilities US ports - security status USCG USCG releases Port Security Advisory on port facility security in Haiti Voluntary self-assessment by SOLAS Contracting Governments and port facilities Voluntary self-assessment checklist for Companies and CSOs
Technical
IACS CSR tracking database goes on line Protective coatings of dedicated seawater ballast tanks required in all types of ships and double-sided skin spaces of bulk carriers Means of Access INTERTANKO Model Clauses Technical Projects IMO Meeting Papers USCG INTERTANKO/OCIMF/Class Discussions North American Issues Bunkering - general Bunker Alerts Air Emissions Tank Level and Pressure Monitoring (TLPM) Systems Tanker Specification Awareness Guide Transparency Protection of Bunker Tanks FPSOs and FSUs - MARPOL Annex I Requirements Goal Based Standards Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) Newbuilding Standards: Extended guarantee/net-scantlings/corrosion margins Generic vs. ship specific corrosion allowances for existing ships Coating on cargo tanks
TOTS - An Introduction & Frequently Asked Questions
Vetting & Port State Control
Worldscale
 
Regions
Asia
Europe
North America
 
Benchmarking
Vessel Inspection Questionnaire (VIQ)
TMSA2
Crew & Officer Retention
Lost Time Indicator (LTI)
 
Databases
Confidential Accident Reporting Platform (CARP)
Human Element Landscape Database
Inspection Feedback Databases
Port Information
Questionnaire 88
STS Database
Terminal Vetting Reports & Terminal Satisfaction Sheets
 
Various
Annual Events
Committees, councils and regional panels
IMO submisssions
Intertanko Presentations
Intranet (Staff Only)
Maritime Industry Knowledge Centre
Poseidon Challenge
Tanker Issues A-Z
Weekly NEWS
 
 
Mail present page to a friend Print present page

INTERTANKO builds on IMO process with policy statement on GHG emissions from shipping
Published: 18 November 2009 17:12
Updated: 18 November 2009 17:41

Executive summary

 

INTERTANKO’s policy on Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission reductions from ships, as approved by the Association’s Council, has been written into a comprehensive policy statement that will be used by us as we represent our Members in upcoming international fora discussing GHG emission reductions. This policy will be reviewed and updated, as necessary, based on developments in these international fora.

 

We believe that the IMO is the appropriate body to regulate GHG emissions from ships and fully support the IMO process to develop real and sustainable GHG emission reduction regulations from ships that will not hinder international commerce.  In addition, we strongly support the principle that GHG regulations should be ship/flag neutral.

 

INTERTANKO advocates measures that would result in tangible CO2 and other GHG emissions reductions from tankers in a positive, proactive manner. We recognise the importance of working with other stakeholders to ensure the maximum efficiency of both new ships and existing ships. To this end we are working with shipbuilders and others on the design and construction of new ships, and with other partners in the transportation chain on the utilisation of ships in service.

 

We believe that short and long term target levels for GHG emission reductions from ships should be ambitious but realistic, and provide incentives for sustainably achieving them.

 

We will analyse Market Based Instruments (MBI) against the Association adopted principles and will report the results of its evaluation as soon as the details of concrete proposals become available. 

 

INTERTANKO’s policy

 

Climate Change

INTERTANKO agrees that each industry sector, including transportation, should strive to deliver a significant contribution by reducing its Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, particularly CO2 emissions.

 

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Shipping

INTERTANKO advocates measures that would result in CO2 and other GHG emissions reductions from tankers. Some measures, such as ship operations, are under the direct control and thus the responsibility of tanker operators. However, some other measures, such as improved ship design, improved technologies and improved logistics can only be obtained through a close and coordinated cooperation with other stakeholders and with governments.

 

INTERTANKO believes that energy efficiency will be gained through better synergy, better coordination and systematic efforts towards optimising shipping movements jointly with the other stakeholders involved in the logistical chain.

 

Regulatory developments

INTERTANKO believes that the IMO is the appropriate body to regulate GHG emissions from ships. INTERTANKO supports the IMO process to develop real and sustainable GHG emission reduction regulations from ships that will not hinder international commerce.

 

INTERTANKO supports the idea that the GHG regulations should be “ship neutral” as the only way to address a global environmental issue. Differentiating vessels’ GHG obligations on the basis of a vessel’s flag would fail to make a meaningful environmental improvement.

 

Measures for GHG emission reductions

INTERTANKO supports the adoption of the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) as soon as possible. INTERTANKO also encourages the IMO to use the EEDI formulae for an early establishment of target levels for CO2 emission reductions for new ships.

 

INTERTANKO supports the adoption of Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) by the IMO. INTERTANKO members routinely apply operational measures aimed at improving ships’ fuel efficiency.

 

INTERTANKO has developed a SEEMP model specifically for tankers which is being made available to our Members. The guide for tankers facilitates a harmonised and comprehensive recording, monitoring and reporting of the results. It also provides further guidance on the usage of the Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator (EEOI).

 

INTERTANKO is actively involved in developing best industry practice together with other stakeholders, particularly charterers, for a better planning of the voyage with the view of reducing CO2 emissions.

 

Market-Based Instruments (MBI)

INTERTANKO is making an in-depth analysis of any concrete Market Based Instruments (MBI) proposal against a set of principles the Association has adopted and which embody the IMO’s nine principles. This incorporates an assessment of the role and objectives for an MBI, as well as its potential integration with other measures being developed within the IMO.

 

INTERTANKO will report the result of its evaluations and a comparison between various concrete alternative proposals as soon as more detailed presentations of these are available.

 

Targets for GHG Emissions Reductions

Shipping is a service industry whose activity increases or contracts with the demands of society. Therefore INTERTANKO believes that GHG emission reduction targets should give due regard to optimising the supply chain.

 

INTERTANKO believes it is essential that both stakeholders and regulators discuss and assess short and long term targeting levels for GHG emission reductions from shipping. The target levels should be ambitious, but they should also be realistic and thus provide the incentive for sustainable efforts to achieve them.

 

INTERTANKO believes it is more important to initiate the process of GHG emission reductions from shipping as soon as possible, while accepting that the initially agreed target levels could be adjusted as experience is gained.

 

 



Search
Quick search
Advertisement